S-0001For teams

Everyone builds from the same truth. Including the agents.

For small teams and dev shops whose developers already run Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex, and who have noticed that faster is not the same as right.

See how it works →
S-0002Sound familiar?

Velocity went up. So did the regressions.

  • "Nobody can review everything the agents write."
  • "It works. It's just not how we build things here."
  • "Onboarding means re-explaining the whole product."
  • "Delivered to spec. Their reading of it."
S-0003What changes

One record per project. Every dev and every agent builds from it.

  1. 01

    The truth leaves the chat.

    Features, rules, decisions, open questions, on the record and anchored to the code. Your senior dev's judgment stops living in their head and a Slack thread. New hire, contractor, or agent: same brief, same day.

  2. 02

    Your standards in every session.

    One rule set for coding standards, security baseline, and the CSS you'd accept, compiled per tool into CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, or AGENTS.md before the run. It stops drifting across repos because there is only one copy.

  3. 03

    Work packets nobody can misread.

    Intent, rules, acceptance criteria, and the boundary of what must not change. An agent works a scoped change, not a free roam of the repo. A mid-level dev gets the same brief and builds the same thing.

  4. 04

    A check after every run.

    What changed, what broke, what quietly drifted from a rule nobody mentioned in the ticket. Shown with the rule it broke, before your users find it. Your senior dev decides on it in a minute instead of reading the diff at midnight.

  5. 05

    Inside the tools you already use.

    Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex, over MCP, on the subscriptions your devs already have. Your git, your CI, your pull requests. Artifact doesn't replace any of it.

Governance
Northline Dispatch / Features / Assign a load to a driver

Assign a load to a driver

4 rules · 5 acceptance criteria · 3 decisions · last checked against code 14 min ago

  • Eligible drivers first Decided Aug 4 — checked on every change
    Matches intent
  • A driver over hours is never offered a load Built: a warning only. The build stopped matching what you meant.
    Drifted
  • Driver runs out of hours mid-route You haven't decided: re-assign automatically, or a dispatcher's call?
    Open question
  • Assignment is attributed Decided Jul 22 — checked on every change
    Matches intent

What the team sees. Every mismatch shown with the intent it violates. Regression to fix, or intent that changed: a human decides.

S-0004Running a dev shop?

Get it in writing.

Every dispute comes down to intent that was never written where both sides could see it. A record per client, with the client's name on every decision, makes the next dispute a link instead of an argument.

Connect a client's repos read-only and get a first picture of what the system actually does: evidence-based, confidence-scored, gaps reported as gaps. Show the client a governance surface instead of a status email. Onboard any dev onto any account in a morning.

Never writes to a repo

Read-only, always. Your team ships the code.

Never holds a copy

Your agent reads in its own session. The server keeps an index and a citation.

Never bills for viewers

Adding a client as a reader of their own record never punishes you.

Never blocks

Warnings with the reason attached. Your senior dev decides.

Your process, plus two steps.

A brief before every run, a check after. Bring one repo and we'll connect it together in a working session.

Under the hood →